![]() ![]() These workflows, ingenious as there are, can’t escape their nature as a patchwork of separate interchangeable parts which no one wants to admit are mostly makeshift and totally replaceable and kinda suck. There are even Adobe apps for that!īut let’s be honest. There are neat ways to manage a single cloud based library you can refer everything to. Certainly there are ways: It’s near sustainable if you’re willing to go iOS only. Transporting images out of your Mac feels about the same but more convoluted. Especially if you take pictures with something besides your phone, finding a way to manage and edit images between a laptop, tablet, and phone involves enough legwork to probably not be worth bothering with in the first place.īatch editing images on iOS devices is at best a time sucking pain. And there’s definitely no app that will manage all this across all your devices. The problem is that there’s no single app that will take care of it all for you. There are great apps for syncing and uploading images you’ve taken on your phone, even better apps to edit those images, and 1 billion different ways to share those images with others. But I so want to believe in this unicorn photo future. As someone that uses iTunes regularly, there’s a part of me that has, like, a disproportionate amount of doubts about this. This forthcoming Photos app from Apple has capital-A ambitions: A from-scratch photo editing app to replace iPhoto and Aperture that’s tied to a cloud based image library, that automatically synchronizes changes across any Mac or iOS device, and which-unlike iPhoto or Aperture-people actually look forward to using. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |