![]() ![]() I think that when BM arrives for real in the IP video space, they will deliver a full end-to-end workflow, complete with cameras, switchers, converters, HyperDecks, broadcast panels, video hubs and software so that a customer can fully implement an IP video solution. I have a feeling they wanted to see where the market was headed a bit, and dipped a toe in the water with their Teranex tico-based IP product. The new fiber converters for URSA Broadcast leverage IP video, and Grant even said during the product introduction last year that they are working on IP stuff for the future. After all, brand agnostic is one of Dante's biggest advantages.įeels like BMD has some significant stuff in development for IP video, especially given the lack of IP products they have released thus far. NDI seems to have made the biggest strides in this area, so why not embraces this no matter what manufacturer you happen to be. Maybe for an occassional conversion, but certainly not to make my core system work. I'm not going to buy a bunch of intermediate devices to prop up this idea either. There are several standards floating around, but I've yet to see a path to a full system of IP video yet. We need the whole enchilada whether everyone realises this or not. From camera to switcher to recorder to monitoring to transmission/distribution. What I do care about, and desperately want to see, is devices that support IP video through the entire chain. ![]() Im sold on an idea that video can play network wide like Dante does with audio, and I don't really care which standard it is. No disrespect intended, but i hardly think that TICO in a single product that's hard to setup and use is cause to celebrate, or reason to abandon any other method. Xtreemtec wrote:Great BUT BMD has a license with TICO and not with NDI for video over IP. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |